Mobile Vulgus said... "How dare you guys make fun of my account being suspended? F*#% you stupid jerks! You and your blog are nothing but S#*%! Go to h*#%!"
Vulgar to the end. Sad.
Let this be a lesson, Moby. You aren't nearly as important as you think.
----------- Heaven's just a rumor she'll dispel As she walks me through the nicest parts of Hell I still dream of lips I never should have never kissed Well she knows exactly what I can't resist. -----------
Himself still gets squirmy when that song plays......;]
Besides, I hear there's already a comeback in the works. Don't be surprised to see him in the near future as "The Blogger Formerly Known as Mobile Vulgus".
You guys are rotten jerks. I don't know what happened, but I bet you all had something to do with his getting banned. Maybe one of you staged something or lied to the mods about something he said. And now you are gloating about it. Maybe Mobile Vulgus was right when he called you stupid disruptive Soros-paid trolls.
"I am so tired of arguing with you stupid idiots. NOW STAY OFF OF MY THREADS! My blog is useful, you guys and your blog isn't. " Shouldn't have said that, fudge boy. We're going to be all over your threads now.
You all are so mean. i don't know how you framed Mobil Vulgis to get him baned, but I just know you all must have had a hand in it. ------------------------
Rest in peace Mobile Vulges. You will be well remembred by all the good FReeppers on FR. We miss you.
I hope that stupid humbelgunner gets zotted. He is such a jerk and likes to mess things up for poeple.
That's the key right there. Now the pimp crackdown is starting to make sense. I bet there was a Mod meeting to discuss the sorry state of blogpimping on FR and a strategy was devised to combat it. Moby was the first pimpkill.
YOU are the muslim troll, fat head! You can't seem to help yourself from being a tard and a turd. Just go away and leave MY threads alone, jerk. And quit calling me a blogpimp. I have not broken any FR rules, so you couldn't possibly have anything meaningful to say to me on the subject.
Is that a thret? I know you guys were at least partly respnosble for getting Mobil Vulgis baned. Are you going to talk to the moderatrs about having me baned to? You poeple are scum.
Believe it or not, once upon a time vanities were frowned upon by our participants. FR’s original format was established to not only fight for liberty and against government abuse/corruption, etc, but to criticize the liberally biased mainstream media. Therefore our original format was to post from valid NEWS sources and government reports, etc, and to tear them down where deserved. Vanity posters were shunned (unless they were very good).
Then a few years ago the blogger craze started. At first, most of them were treated simply as vanities and were pulled or zotted on sight. Eventually some were accepted as valid material on FR. And soon the blogger wars commenced. To allow blogs or not to allow blogs was the question. Can’t go blanket either way. Like it or not, some blogs are better than most others.
So, long story short, we created a special forum for blog posts. This was in lieu of simply deleting all blog posts. The theory was that as long as they were posted in the bloggers forum, those who didn’t wish to read them could simply click on the “news” forum and they wouldn’t see them. But, of course, as some blogs are definitely better than most others and some are much better than your typical mainstream news sources, we soon allowed certain blogs to be posted regularly to the news section.
This all worked more or less to a certain degree without too much friction until the non-commenting, short-excerpting, long-complaining blog pimp was born.
I have no complaint if a good conservative blogger posts his own material to FR, not as an excerpt to drive hits and discussion back to his blog, but rather to impart useful information to OUR readers and to promote and join in on the discussion and conservative activism HERE on FR.
If a blogger can’t or refuses do that, and if he constantly complains or fights with our participants over it, then I’d just as soon he doesn’t post here. It’s not my job to make his content or his presentation or cooperation acceptable to our readers. That’s his job. And if he cannot do it or refuses to do it and continues posting brief excerpts only and obviously attempting to draw away our participants while loudly complaining about it, then I have no sympathy for his complaints and the more apt I am to ban his account and blog.
Furthermore, I’m not big on “rules.” You won’t see me posting rules for bloggers. The rules for bloggers on FR are the same as the rules for everyone else. If you are a good conservative activist and are willing to work with US on OUR goals and causes and not against US, then you’re welcome to post to FR. But unless we say otherwise your blog material should be posted to our bloggers forum and it would be best if you do not excerpt your own material and if you would actually join in on the discussion here on FR. We’re not really that interested in driving OUR traffic to YOUR blog. But if our readers see that you post useful information then they might start reading your site and that’s fine by me.
552 posted on Tuesday, December 07, 2010 4:06:19 PM by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Nuke the corrupt commie bastards to HELL!!) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
Believe it or not, once upon a time vanities were frowned upon by our participants. FR’s original format was established to not only fight for liberty and against government abuse/corruption, etc, but to criticize the liberally biased mainstream media. Therefore our original format was to post from valid NEWS sources and government reports, etc, and to tear them down where deserved. Vanity posters were shunned (unless they were very good).
Then a few years ago the blogger craze started. At first, most of them were treated simply as vanities and were pulled or zotted on sight. Eventually some were accepted as valid material on FR. And soon the blogger wars commenced. To allow blogs or not to allow blogs was the question. Can’t go blanket either way. Like it or not, some blogs are better than most others.
So, long story short, we created a special forum for blog posts. This was in lieu of simply deleting all blog posts. The theory was that as long as they were posted in the bloggers forum, those who didn’t wish to read them could simply click on the “news” forum and they wouldn’t see them. But, of course, as some blogs are definitely better than most others and some are much better than your typical mainstream news sources, we soon allowed certain blogs to be posted regularly to the news section.
This all worked more or less to a certain degree without too much friction until the non-commenting, short-excerpting, long-complaining blog pimp was born.
I have no complaint if a good conservative blogger posts his own material to FR, not as an excerpt to drive hits and discussion back to his blog, but rather to impart useful information to OUR readers and to promote and join in on the discussion and conservative activism HERE on FR.
If a blogger can’t or refuses do that, and if he constantly complains or fights with our participants over it, then I’d just as soon he doesn’t post here. It’s not my job to make his content or his presentation or cooperation acceptable to our readers. That’s his job. And if he cannot do it or refuses to do it and continues posting brief excerpts only and obviously attempting to draw away our participants while loudly complaining about it, then I have no sympathy for his complaints and the more apt I am to ban his account and blog.
Furthermore, I’m not big on “rules.” You won’t see me posting rules for bloggers. The rules for bloggers on FR are the same as the rules for everyone else. If you are a good conservative activist and are willing to work with US on OUR goals and causes and not against US, then you’re welcome to post to FR. But unless we say otherwise your blog material should be posted to our bloggers forum and it would be best if you do not excerpt your own material and if you would actually join in on the discussion here on FR. We’re not really that interested in driving OUR traffic to YOUR blog. But if our readers see that you post useful information then they might start reading your site and that’s fine by me.
552 posted on Tuesday, December 07, 2010 4:06:19 PM by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Nuke the corrupt commie bastards to HELL!!) [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
Talkradio03 said: "Are you going to talk to the moderatrs about having me baned to? You poeple are scum."
Don't need to talk to 'em. They are aware of you. There may be a couple of 'em just right here on this thread. "Baned"? I'd prefer "Caned" but I'm kinda old-school, chum.
Are you making fun of my speling now? So what, I made one mistake, big deal. It just demanstrats how lame you really are. I don't know why the moderatrs tollerate you guys posting on Free Repubilc at all.
"Are you making fun of my speling now? So what, I made one mistake, big deal. It just demanstrats how lame you really are. I don't know why the moderatrs tollerate you guys posting on Free Repubilc at all."
Is that a thret? I know you guys were at least partly respnosble for getting Mobil Vulgis baned. Are you going to talk to the moderatrs about having me baned to? You poeple are scum.
"Are you making fun of my speling now? So what, I made one mistake, big deal. It just demanstrats how lame you really are. I don't know why the moderatrs tollerate you guys posting on Free Repubilc at all."
---------
Excuse me but if this keeps up I'm going to have to demand an interpreter.
Cold "No Speaka Da Mangled Language" Djinn
[correct me if I'm wrong but wouldn't "reputable, serious "bloggers" at least pay a few bucks for spell checking software, should they happen to lack an innate command of English?]
Jim Robinson at Free Republic said the following regarding blogpimps...
"I have no complaint if a good conservative blogger posts his own material to FR, not as an excerpt to drive hits and discussion back to his blog, but rather to impart useful information to OUR readers and to promote and join in on the discussion and conservative activism HERE on FR.
If a blogger can’t or refuses do that, and if he constantly complains or fights with our participants over it, then I’d just as soon he doesn’t post here. It’s not my job to make his content or his presentation or cooperation acceptable to our readers. That’s his job. And if he cannot do it or refuses to do it and continues posting brief excerpts only and obviously attempting to draw away our participants while loudly complaining about it, then I have no sympathy for his complaints and the more apt I am to ban his account and blog."
C. Logan in his own words said...
"I have repeatedly said the reason I excerpt, is that I want people to go to my site."
I'm saddened at his loss, but unto all things there is a time.
ReplyDeleteCruel is the bird, and cruel are the sons of the bird.
RIP MV
ReplyDeleteI bet he burst a blood vessel when he found out he got banned/suspended.
LOL!
How dare you guys make fun of my account being suspended? F*#% you stupid jerks! You and your blog are nothing but S#*%! Go to h*#%!
ReplyDeleteMobile Vulgus said...
ReplyDelete"How dare you guys make fun of my account being suspended? F*#% you stupid jerks! You and your blog are nothing but S#*%! Go to h*#%!"
Vulgar to the end. Sad.
Let this be a lesson, Moby. You aren't nearly as important as you think.
Well, like he said in his sub-header disclaimers..
ReplyDeleteJim Rob finally clarified things for him.
I guess things are pretty clear now.
That's what happens to people who don't know how to spell "Houston."
ReplyDeleteI miss him.
ReplyDelete"Go to h*#%!""
ReplyDeleteWhere exactly *is* h*#%?
My Garmin can't locate it.
"I guess things are pretty clear now."
ReplyDeleteAs clear as an azure sky.....
Cold Droog
Cold Djinn said...
ReplyDelete"Where exactly *is* h*#%?"
Don't play innocent, you little imp!
Mobile Vulgus has left the building.
ReplyDeleteJim Rob says no farewell tour either.
Heh.
ReplyDeleteNIN "Sanctified" lyrics snippet;
-----------
Heaven's just a rumor she'll dispel
As she walks me through the nicest parts of Hell
I still dream of lips I never should have never kissed
Well she knows exactly what I can't resist.
-----------
Himself still gets squirmy when that song plays......;]
[is h*#% where the darned go when they die?]
.
Fat Elvis said...
ReplyDeleteMobile Vulgus has left the building.
Jim Rob says no farewell tour either.
---------
Do I get a ticket refund??
.
Appropriate tunage and imagery:
ReplyDeletehttp://pawsru.org/flash/src/flash7920_tonightYiff_in_hell.jpg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY0WxgSXdEE
ColdDjinn asked...
ReplyDelete"Do I get a ticket reund??"
---
Don't get your hopes up.
Besides, I hear there's already a comeback in the works.
Don't be surprised to see him in the near future as "The Blogger Formerly Known as Mobile Vulgus".
To: Mobile Vulgus...
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Los0g9Et7Ow
Soros just sent me a bonus!
ReplyDelete(E-notification of direct deposit)
Having heled take out that paragon of freedom Mobile Vulgus
and silencing him on Free Republic will look GREAT
on my resume.
My George Soros bonus is bigger than yours! Nyanyanya! :)
ReplyDeleteYou guys are rotten jerks. I don't know what happened, but I bet you all had something to do with his getting banned. Maybe one of you staged something or lied to the mods about something he said. And now you are gloating about it. Maybe Mobile Vulgus was right when he called you stupid disruptive Soros-paid trolls.
ReplyDeleteBlog Pimp said:
ReplyDelete"Soros just sent me a bonus!"
Foozle said:
"My George Soros bonus is bigger"
So you all admit it! You ARE Soros funded! I knew it! I KNEW it! You evil scum!
C. Logan said:
ReplyDelete"You guys are rotten jerks. I don't know what happened, but I bet you all had something to do with his getting banned."
Word around the intertubes is that Jim Rob saw some of the pix from Moby's Mexican sexcapade vacation. They're all over Facebook.
Jim is notoriously intolerant of fags and pedophiles.
I don't blame Jim for not wanting perverted posters.
C Logan said...
ReplyDelete"Maybe Mobile Vulgus was right when he called you stupid disruptive Soros-paid trolls."
---
And maybe you're a Muslim troll.
Your taqiyya is showing again.
Mobile Vulgus said...
ReplyDelete"So you all admit it! You ARE Soros funded! I knew it! I KNEW it! You evil scum!"
---
Yeah? Well what are you going to do about it, tell Jim Robinson?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA!
"I bet you all had something to do with his getting banned."
ReplyDelete*I* bet distorting Jim's own words in MV's "disclaimer" played a huge part in his unceremonious ZOTting.
Loyalty is very admirable, Logan.
-Blind- loyalty is just stupid.
You reap what you sow.
.
"Blog Pimp said...
ReplyDeleteAppropriate tunage and imagery:"
I will NOT click on anything with the word "yiff" in it.
I was recently told what that word means.
*gag*
.
Mobile Vulgus said:
ReplyDelete"So you all admit it! You ARE Soros funded! I knew it! I KNEW it! You evil scum!"
I'm George Soros. They're joking. Why would I waste my time and money on a loser like you? LOL
I am so tired of arguing with you stupid idiots. NOW STAY OFF OF MY THREADS! My blog is useful, you guys and your blog isn't.
ReplyDeleteEND OF CONVERSATION
C. Logan said...
ReplyDelete"I am so tired of arguing with you stupid idiots. NOW STAY OFF OF MY THREADS! My blog is useful, you guys and your blog isn't.
"
Shouldn't have said that, fudge boy. We're going to be all over your threads now.
You all are so mean. i don't know how you framed Mobil Vulgis to get him baned, but I just know you all must have had a hand in it.
ReplyDelete------------------------
Rest in peace Mobile Vulges. You will be well remembred by all the good FReeppers on FR. We miss you.
I hope that stupid humbelgunner gets zotted. He is such a jerk and likes to mess things up for poeple.
Humblegunner was zotted years ago.
ReplyDeleteHe deserved it.
Unfortunately he made a deal with the devil or Soros or someone and he can still post on FR even though he is banned.
It's infuriating.
And glossy.
Talkradio03 said...
ReplyDelete"Rest in peace Mobile Vulges. You will be well remembred by all the good FReeppers on FR. We miss you. "
You'll be joining Moby soon enough, pimp boy.
To Talkradio03:
ReplyDeleteYour spelling is disgusting.
The really funny part is we had nothing to do with his ZOT.
ReplyDeleteHe auto-ZOTted.
Lex talionis is so cool.
.
Talkradio03 said...
ReplyDelete"You all are so mean. i don't know how you framed Mobil Vulgis to get him baned, but I just know you all must have had a hand in it."
---
How about shutting the hell up!
"Rest in peace Mobile Vulges. You will be well remembred by all the good FReeppers on FR. We miss you."
ReplyDeleteIs this the joke where the punchline is "But our aim is getting better"?
.
The bleating sycophants lost their god.
Bummer.
.
Cold Djinn said...
ReplyDelete"The bleating sycophants LOST THEIR GOD."
That's the key right there. Now the pimp crackdown is starting to make sense. I bet there was a Mod meeting to discuss the sorry state of blogpimping on FR and a strategy was devised to combat it. Moby was the first pimpkill.
I have AdSense on our business sites.
ReplyDeleteSometimes people click the ads and it basically garners pocket change for me.
[which gets blown on the dogs, mostly]
I think it's a relatively innocuous thing BUT I would not USE Free Republic *ever* to pimp those sites.
JimRob has to pay money for his bandwidth.
If I "piggyback" my site on his, that makes me a parasite.
Why is that concept so hard for blogpimps to understand?
[unless, of course, that ~is~ their intention]
.
Fat Elvis said:
ReplyDelete"Maybe you're a muslim troll"
YOU are the muslim troll, fat head! You can't seem to help yourself from being a tard and a turd. Just go away and leave MY threads alone, jerk. And quit calling me a blogpimp. I have not broken any FR rules, so you couldn't possibly have anything meaningful to say to me on the subject.
END OF CONVERSATION!
Floyd R. Turbo said;
ReplyDelete"You'll be joining Moby soon enough, pimp boy."
Is that a thret? I know you guys were at least partly respnosble for getting Mobil Vulgis baned. Are you going to talk to the moderatrs about having me baned to? You poeple are scum.
Jim Robinson said:
ReplyDeleteTo: Velveeta; Islaminaction; humblegunner; All
Believe it or not, once upon a time vanities were frowned upon by our participants. FR’s original format was established to not only fight for liberty and against government abuse/corruption, etc, but to criticize the liberally biased mainstream media. Therefore our original format was to post from valid NEWS sources and government reports, etc, and to tear them down where deserved. Vanity posters were shunned (unless they were very good).
Then a few years ago the blogger craze started. At first, most of them were treated simply as vanities and were pulled or zotted on sight. Eventually some were accepted as valid material on FR. And soon the blogger wars commenced. To allow blogs or not to allow blogs was the question. Can’t go blanket either way. Like it or not, some blogs are better than most others.
So, long story short, we created a special forum for blog posts. This was in lieu of simply deleting all blog posts. The theory was that as long as they were posted in the bloggers forum, those who didn’t wish to read them could simply click on the “news” forum and they wouldn’t see them. But, of course, as some blogs are definitely better than most others and some are much better than your typical mainstream news sources, we soon allowed certain blogs to be posted regularly to the news section.
This all worked more or less to a certain degree without too much friction until the non-commenting, short-excerpting, long-complaining blog pimp was born.
I have no complaint if a good conservative blogger posts his own material to FR, not as an excerpt to drive hits and discussion back to his blog, but rather to impart useful information to OUR readers and to promote and join in on the discussion and conservative activism HERE on FR.
If a blogger can’t or refuses do that, and if he constantly complains or fights with our participants over it, then I’d just as soon he doesn’t post here. It’s not my job to make his content or his presentation or cooperation acceptable to our readers. That’s his job. And if he cannot do it or refuses to do it and continues posting brief excerpts only and obviously attempting to draw away our participants while loudly complaining about it, then I have no sympathy for his complaints and the more apt I am to ban his account and blog.
Furthermore, I’m not big on “rules.” You won’t see me posting rules for bloggers. The rules for bloggers on FR are the same as the rules for everyone else. If you are a good conservative activist and are willing to work with US on OUR goals and causes and not against US, then you’re welcome to post to FR. But unless we say otherwise your blog material should be posted to our bloggers forum and it would be best if you do not excerpt your own material and if you would actually join in on the discussion here on FR. We’re not really that interested in driving OUR traffic to YOUR blog. But if our readers see that you post useful information then they might start reading your site and that’s fine by me.
552 posted on Tuesday, December 07, 2010 4:06:19 PM by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Nuke the corrupt commie bastards to HELL!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
To: Velveeta; Islaminaction; humblegunner; All
ReplyDeleteBelieve it or not, once upon a time vanities were frowned upon by our participants. FR’s original format was established to not only fight for liberty and against government abuse/corruption, etc, but to criticize the liberally biased mainstream media. Therefore our original format was to post from valid NEWS sources and government reports, etc, and to tear them down where deserved. Vanity posters were shunned (unless they were very good).
Then a few years ago the blogger craze started. At first, most of them were treated simply as vanities and were pulled or zotted on sight. Eventually some were accepted as valid material on FR. And soon the blogger wars commenced. To allow blogs or not to allow blogs was the question. Can’t go blanket either way. Like it or not, some blogs are better than most others.
So, long story short, we created a special forum for blog posts. This was in lieu of simply deleting all blog posts. The theory was that as long as they were posted in the bloggers forum, those who didn’t wish to read them could simply click on the “news” forum and they wouldn’t see them. But, of course, as some blogs are definitely better than most others and some are much better than your typical mainstream news sources, we soon allowed certain blogs to be posted regularly to the news section.
This all worked more or less to a certain degree without too much friction until the non-commenting, short-excerpting, long-complaining blog pimp was born.
I have no complaint if a good conservative blogger posts his own material to FR, not as an excerpt to drive hits and discussion back to his blog, but rather to impart useful information to OUR readers and to promote and join in on the discussion and conservative activism HERE on FR.
If a blogger can’t or refuses do that, and if he constantly complains or fights with our participants over it, then I’d just as soon he doesn’t post here. It’s not my job to make his content or his presentation or cooperation acceptable to our readers. That’s his job. And if he cannot do it or refuses to do it and continues posting brief excerpts only and obviously attempting to draw away our participants while loudly complaining about it, then I have no sympathy for his complaints and the more apt I am to ban his account and blog.
Furthermore, I’m not big on “rules.” You won’t see me posting rules for bloggers. The rules for bloggers on FR are the same as the rules for everyone else. If you are a good conservative activist and are willing to work with US on OUR goals and causes and not against US, then you’re welcome to post to FR. But unless we say otherwise your blog material should be posted to our bloggers forum and it would be best if you do not excerpt your own material and if you would actually join in on the discussion here on FR. We’re not really that interested in driving OUR traffic to YOUR blog. But if our readers see that you post useful information then they might start reading your site and that’s fine by me.
552 posted on Tuesday, December 07, 2010 4:06:19 PM by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Nuke the corrupt commie bastards to HELL!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
Talkradio03 said:
ReplyDelete"Are you going to talk to the moderatrs about having me baned to? You poeple are scum."
Don't need to talk to 'em.
They are aware of you. There may be a couple of 'em
just right here on this thread. "Baned"? I'd prefer
"Caned" but I'm kinda old-school, chum.
Pimp on, pimper. Make your time.
Are you making fun of my speling now? So what, I made one mistake, big deal. It just demanstrats how lame you really are. I don't know why the moderatrs tollerate you guys posting on Free Repubilc at all.
ReplyDeleteTo: C. Logan...
ReplyDeleteBlogpimp.
Talkradio03 said...
ReplyDelete"Are you making fun of my speling now? So what, I made one mistake, big deal. It just demanstrats how lame you really are. I don't know why the moderatrs tollerate you guys posting on Free Repubilc at all."
Obviously, English is not your native language.
C. Logan said to Fat Elvis...
ReplyDelete"And quit calling me a blogpimp. I have not broken any FR rules, so you couldn't possibly have anything meaningful to say to me on the subject."
---
I wouldn't be so sure about that if I were you.
You're a blogpimp...you've admitted as much yourself.
Fat Elvis said:
ReplyDelete"You're a blogpimp"
You're a fat-head AND a liar. What a great combination. Suits you well, jerk.
END OF CONVERSATION!!!!!!
"END OF CONVERSATION!!!!!!"
ReplyDeleteYou've said this twice now.
Let me know when you really mean it, blogpimp.
And by the way, I just want to say to all of my FRiends out there on the intertubes...
ReplyDeleteHi guys!
To: C. Logan...
ReplyDelete"Hi guys"
Does that ring any bells, Chris?
Can you hear me now?
C. Logan, the blogpimp said...
ReplyDelete"You are a fat-head AND a liar."
---
Moi? A liar?
"I have repeatedly said the reason I excerpt, is that I want people to go to my site."
Chris?! Where are you?!
This is no fun without you, Chris...
Is that a thret? I know you guys were at least partly respnosble for getting Mobil Vulgis baned. Are you going to talk to the moderatrs about having me baned to? You poeple are scum.
ReplyDelete"Are you making fun of my speling now? So what, I made one mistake, big deal. It just demanstrats how lame you really are. I don't know why the moderatrs tollerate you guys posting on Free Repubilc at all."
---------
Excuse me but if this keeps up I'm going to have to demand an interpreter.
Cold "No Speaka Da Mangled Language" Djinn
[correct me if I'm wrong but wouldn't "reputable, serious "bloggers" at least pay a few bucks for spell checking software, should they happen to lack an innate command of English?]
.
And Hi, Elvis!
.
You are a looser.
ReplyDeleteTo: C. Logan the blogpimp...
ReplyDeleteJim Robinson at Free Republic said the following regarding blogpimps...
"I have no complaint if a good conservative blogger posts his own material to FR, not as an excerpt to drive hits and discussion back to his blog, but rather to impart useful information to OUR readers and to promote and join in on the discussion and conservative activism HERE on FR.
If a blogger can’t or refuses do that, and if he constantly complains or fights with our participants over it, then I’d just as soon he doesn’t post here. It’s not my job to make his content or his presentation or cooperation acceptable to our readers. That’s his job. And if he cannot do it or refuses to do it and continues posting brief excerpts only and obviously attempting to draw away our participants while loudly complaining about it, then I have no sympathy for his complaints and the more apt I am to ban his account and blog."
C. Logan in his own words said...
"I have repeatedly said the reason I excerpt, is that I want people to go to my site."
Q.E.D.
blogpimp
TCB
Hi, Cold Djinn!